Monday, October 29, 2012

Ready or Not, Here it Comes: Health Reform



Kim Johnson, Deputy Director, NIATx

With Election Day fast approaching, healthcare reform is a hot topic. Many believe the election results will determine the future of the Affordable Care Act, which is designed to extend health insurance coverage to more than 30 million Americans.  Yet regardless of who wins in November, behavioral healthcare providers need to adapt to changes that are already taking place and are not likely to be reversed.
The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, passed in 2008, requires insurance plans that offer coverage for mental illness and substance use disorders provide those benefits at the same level as medical and surgical procedures. The Affordable Care Act will require all insurance plans to provide coverage for mental illness and substance abuse disorders. Both pieces of legislation present behavioral health providers with the option of billing third-party payers for the services they provide—for some new sources of revenue to replace rapidly shrinking state and federal grant funds. 
While some states oppose making changes required to prepare for the ACA, others are moving forward with Accountable Care Organizations and Health Insurance Exchanges. Treatment organizations need to stay on top of what’s happening in their states. Rather than “wait and see,” the best approach may be build capacity to bill for services, because no matter who gets elected, grant funds are not likely to increase.
States across the country have slashed funding, and we can’t assume that the federal block grants for mental health and substance abuse treatment are going to continue at their current level, especially with the “fiscal cliff” of tax increases and spending cuts looming ahead of us at the end of 2012 if Congress doesn’t act. It’s likely that we’ll see more cuts. Finding other sources of revenue will be even more crucial.  
Aside from healthcare reform, other forces are driving change in the addiction treatment field. The Partnership at Drugfree.org recently reported that visits to physicians for substance use disorders, primarily opioid abuse, increased by 70% between 2003 and 2009. With an increase in the awareness of addiction as a treatable disease, more people will seek treatment from their primary care providers. Specialty treatment programs need to consider partnering with these providers, or addiction treatment may go the way of depression treatment–with most people seeking medication, and counseling becoming an ancillary service.
The health reform ball has been rolling for some time now for behavioral health providers. What happens in November may slow it down or adjust its course, but not stop it.  Now’s the time to prepare.

Monday, October 15, 2012

Where are we with parity?


This month marks the anniversary of the Wellstone and Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA), signed into law on October 3, 2008. Behavioral health care providers welcomed this legislation. It requires group health plans that cover mental illness and substance use disorders to provide those benefits at the same level as medical and surgical benefits.
While MHPAEA was intended to eliminate unequal coverage and inequities in access to behavioral health treatment, providers and their patients continue to face challenges in making sure the law is fully understood and implemented.
Patrick Gauthier, Director of AHP Healthcare Solutions, addressed these issues in a recent presentation for NIATx, “Parity & Equity Compliance Checker: Disputing the Decisions that Affect Your Bottom Line.  
 “MHPAEA was and continues to be an important victory for all Americans,” said Gauthier. “It’s as much a civil rights success story as it is an insurance reform. Viewed in relation to the Affordable Care Act…MHPAEA is our gold standard for behavioral health benefits. We should all be actively involved in its implementation and enforcement. That work must happen at the state and community levels.”
The October 15 issue of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Weekly discusses problems with parity implementation in the article “Some payers still defy parity law with ‘fail-first’ and reviews.”   Do you work with any health plans that fail to adhere to the federal parity law?  If so, what action have you taken in response?